Velandia Mora, Manuel Antonio
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Faculty of Education / MA in Education Sessions
thought processes
From Aristotle, hermeneutics, in full consciousness, is the meaning of the phrase. But strictly speaking, of course, the phrase is susceptible of being true or false, ie the declarative sentence. The split between the meaning and the thing is already accomplished with the name, and the distance marks the site of interpretation. To interpret is to say something about something, so the true meanings are indirect. The multiple meanings opens a gap in the theory of uniqueness.
to the biblical tradition, hermeneutics is the science of the rules of exegesis, which is a scriptural science, understood as a particular interpretation of a text. Notions of analogy, allegory and symbolic meaning. To understand is to make a substitution, make a new construct.
For Nietzsche all philosophy is interpretation. All destruction is a time for a new foundation. Located at the crux of the problem of "value" looking from the side of the "strength" and "weakness" of the Will to Power the key to the lies and masks.
For Freud every set of signs is likely to be considered for decoding text (what Fernando Vazquez called "Cultural Unity"). The interpretation should be understood as an exercise of suspicion. Log in to the problem of false consciousness by the double gate of sleep and the neurotic symptom.
Marx's theory raises the consciousness reflection. Attack the limits of ideology in the limits of economic alienation.
Based on the view that what will emerge from a conversation will not know anyone in advance, as expressed by Hans-Georg Gadamer in Truth and Method ", we see that to understand what someone says is to agree on the thing, not get over the other and play their experiences. Language is the medium in which it carries out the partners' agreement and consensus on the matter. What is the meaning should be maintained, hence the importance of having a knowledge of the language as a precondition since any translator interpreter.
In the case of a text, that part of the hermeneutic conversation, you can only get to speak through the other party, the interpreter. It is converted only by written signs with new meaning. Understand and interpret it the same thing. The effect is mediated by the linguistic tradition. No method is innocent. Scripture is
autoextrañamiento. In the form of writing everything occurs simultaneously transmitted to all this, a simultaneous self with all other present. Reading comprehension is participating in this sense.
order to give expression to the reference of a text must be translated into our language, read in conjunction with a set of possible references which move us talking and being willing to express. In the historical understanding is required to set aside their own concepts and to think only in the time it is understood. Mediation is required between those concepts and their own.
understand a text means to explain it and know that auque have to be interpreted in each case in a different way, remains the same text. Linguistic interpretation is the interpretation in general. Occurs where you have to interpret is not linguistic in nature: a painting, for example.
Understanding always involves interpretation. The interpreter uses the words and concepts that are crossed by recognizing the conceptual.
Ricoeur's method:
thesis on the hermeneutics:
1. Interpretation and use of tactics against suspected as masks.
2. There is no universal hermeneutic theory but separate and conflicting rules regarding the wings interpretation.
hermeneutics moves between the will of suspicion and a willingness to listen.
• Recognize and isolate mythemes constituency or from the bases of relations that map the same function to different sentences within a story.
• Structural analysis of the narrative rests on the assumption that all units are above a sentence must be made according to the same laws as undersized units of the sentence.
• Understanding a story is not only secure course in succession, but to discern the vertical axes which are structured according to levels: Level
or function: or Minimum units. Its meaning is to contribute to the sense of the larger units. They are pragmatic levels.
First feature: Delineation of the sequences.
Second feature: Expansion Act narratives: The narrative structure can be extended to the point of incorporating an unlimited number of elements of different origin, including non-narrative.
Third feature: Extension Act by induction: Extend to all the deeds of ancestors, and finally stories of mythical origin and character.
or level actions and mitigating: Enter the relationship with the characters. Sets the status of the character in the story. Hierarchy
responders.
or level of narrative: the story as a whole.
Hermeneutics and the concept of interpretation:
Part of the fact that a sentence is a unit of a type irreducible to all units of language.
• Language is a system with no real existence, the instance of discourse is a current event.
• The instance of discourse is the implementation of the language by a speaker.
• The instance of discourse refers to the world about which something is said.
• The speech is addressed to someone, the language is only a virtual instrument of communication.
Hermeneutics is based on irreducible character of the discourse that formed from the phrase:
• The direction is set by writing.
• With writing the meaning of discourse is independent of the speaker.
• In written speech, the referential function is profoundly altered, and that a text carries within itself its references. • In writing
relationship with the recipient is profoundly altered. The recipient is anyone who can read.
Any interpretation begins first and foremost a "bet" on the meaning. All language
interprets reality. Any sign in relation to the object, is mediated by another sign which is its interpretant.
Note: A hermeneutic that has gone through the hard school of objectification, alienation, structural analysis can not ignore that the only accessible is the co-belonging of the speaker and the interlocutor, but the meaning of the text and its reader. And that, to appropriate the sense in being-in-the-world established by the depth semantics is to understand oneself.
method is proposed as:
1. Willingness to listen and suspicion will: Work with the imaginary, with the deep level of cultural unity.
2. Establish relationships:
• Semantic fields;
• Understand the cultural unity of the dumb part of life.
• Contrast that interprets the cultural unity; see relationships;
• The interpretation should be valid.
3. Mediates Hermeneutics:
• Organize a whole and not to describe but argue.
• Find an axis, a point that gives meaning
• Interpreting is an explanation of the culture.
Additional information may be requested from the author. Schematic 
thought
0 comments:
Post a Comment