By Manuel Antonio Velandia Mora
Spain, January 2011
Among the "ought" of sexuality and the real life of human beings human, there is often a big difference. Just yesterday I was arguing with someone about how you can define a transsexual person, and we concluded it would be more correct to say that a transsexual man is someone who was born with vagina. On the other hand for example the definition of sexual orientation homosexual would be "a man (biological, chosen or transformed) that guides their desires, affections, genital and erotic to another biological man, chosen or transformed."
The problem in the definition of sexuality is that we have always thought that sexuality is a biological fact can not deny that biological variations are much larger than explanations of sexuality, because these are cultural constructions, biologically based definitions that ignore or seek to deny that diversity.
examinations or denials of the other beings do the build from our history, a story that generally seeks to place human beings and their sexuality and supposedly complementary opposites.
When a person know what attracts us and what we reject is knowledge through the relational process, generally see the clothes and accessories that cover the bodies, we hear these voices and tones that sometimes identify as male or female, and receive and give affection because they make us feel happy and fulfilled in spite of our own history and "knowledge."
Sexualities whether emotional, experiential, body and their explanations are not opposites, are a point on a continuum in a wide range of possibilities, since each of us is a unique and unrepeatable if have much in common with other beings.
Each person is a being that is built or being a human being full to the extent that managed to "being" what you've always wanted to be. "Wanting to be" not always a true copy of the "ought", because this is not real, but as mobile is a construction as is our own identity and our own "wanting to be", and this not only happens our sexuality but with many other areas of our daily experiences.
advanced culture with human development, but the culture as a social construct is much slower in processing the individual constructions of sexuality, and this has much in common with other beings.
social organizations thus become living space transformations in the construction of personal, collective and social identity transitions that are often interpreted from outside unless the experience, explains and excited as transgressions of "ought", a "must" in our Judeo-Christian culture, sexist, phallocratic, misogynist and markedly heterosexual denies the diversity and uniqueness.
Humans have a fundamental right is not recognized as such, the right to be involved Ser Because all other rights including the right to be happy. Social relations based on gender bias are the seeds of a countless number of hate crimes which even the laws are lax.
Entres social and legal norms and social reality is a big void, because the laws are not always based on the needs of all humans but the criteria of a few things, and these sometimes they are open and respectful of our humanity and sometimes deeply opposed to what the Judeo-Christian approaches proposed as should be.
Happiness is a relational process, not only has to do with ourselves but also has to do with the relationships we build and what we find them, but relations are contextual and explained, the emotional experiences and from the culture of space in which we are engaged, which is why many times we go unnoticed and some others we are victims of hate crimes.
We can not predict how we will be accepted or denied, but neither the possible acceptance or rejection should be the criterion to decide on our experience, however, the reality of the relationship as a criterion for happiness makes us reflect on our fears and experiences of acceptance or violation of other beings have been subjected.
is believed that those who seek sexual happiness is sick, but that society is sick because it is their culture that makes us sick. A culture based on the laws that determine what we should be, thus denying our own interest and need. Perhaps for this reason that a society must change the rule change and culture and our contribution as human beings is to create the conditions for everyone to be happy and not to just what are those who live or are forced to live should be.
assistance and emotional support should not be for those who want to be full but for those patients who are denied to others from legal criteria, religious or cultural right to be happy. There can be no justice, love and social equity when some who consider themselves the truth, whether it is revealed or humanly created, others claim that accepting this truth as the only possible, thus negating the principles it preaches.
Additional information may be requested from the author. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment